tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4695560142942194798.post3753560576690847126..comments2024-03-09T14:21:37.272+00:00Comments on Deefer Dawg: Uninsured GMOs Matt Carehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02221912203941489737noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4695560142942194798.post-31731609040896744612015-01-23T19:29:31.188+00:002015-01-23T19:29:31.188+00:00I think that is a standard exclusion world wide Ma...I think that is a standard exclusion world wide Matt. As the GM industry has not acknowledged any risk associated with growing GM crops and no independent testing has been done to allow a legal precedent to exist there can be no acknowledged claim of harm. In cases where a farm has been contaminated the farmer has to claim either against the farmer who caused the contamination or the company who supplied the seeds. In the second case the company will in fact lodge a counter claim and sue the contaminated farmer for breach of copy right laws.<br />There is a very interesting 140.000 page document released by the USDA under the freedom of information act which contains statements from the FDA's own scientists stating that GMO's can be harmful both to human and animal health, it is probably the reason that the biotec companies limit their testing to a mere 90 days as these problems do not show up within this time. Anne Wilsonhttp://anirishalternative.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com